claude-fable-5.1 vs deepseek-flash
Both can be used on onomeo. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- claude-fable-5.1
- No edge in the figures
- deepseek-flash
- 4 advantages
How to choose
claude-fable-5.1No edge in the figures
deepseek-flashCheaper: about $0.0055 a reply, 69% lessFaster: 0.7s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #2Open weights
claude-fable-5.1
By Anthropic
deepseek-flash
By DeepSeek
Where they differ
claude-fable-5.1deepseek-flash
On this site
—Availability, last 3 days100%656 calls
3.4sAverage response this week0.7s
$0.018Price per reply$0.0055
#48Place in this week's ranking#2
$216.67Price per million characters—
The model itself
128K tokensLongest reply384K tokens
Jun 2026Knowledge cutoffMay 2025
1 Sep 2026Released10 Sep 2026
NoOpen weightsYes
Where they match
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Context length1M tokens
- Reads imagesYes
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
- Conversations used for trainingUsed to train and improve the provider’s models
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Free models are counted in calls; big models are charged by usage, in US dollars.
Compare next
claude-fable-5.1 against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.