claude-fable-5.1 vs muse-wonder-1.0
Both can be used on onomeo. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- claude-fable-5.1
- No edge in the figures
- muse-wonder-1.0
- 2 advantages
How to choose
claude-fable-5.1No edge in the figures
muse-wonder-1.0Faster: 1.6s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #12
claude-fable-5.1
By Anthropic
muse-wonder-1.0
By Meta
Where they differ
claude-fable-5.1muse-wonder-1.0
On this site
10sAverage response this week1.6s
$0.013Price per reply—
#14Place in this week's ranking#12
$216.67Price per million characters$133.33
The model itself
Jun 2026Knowledge cutoffNot published
1 Sep 2026Released12 Oct 2026
Where they match
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Context length1M tokens
- Longest reply128K tokens
- Reads imagesYes
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
- Conversations used for trainingUsed to train and improve the provider’s models
- Open weightsNo
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Free models are counted in calls; big models are charged by usage, in US dollars.
Compare next
claude-fable-5.1 against other models
muse-wonder-1.0 against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.