claude-fable-5.1 vs glyph-cluster
Both can be used on onomeo. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- claude-fable-5.1
- 3 advantages
- glyph-cluster
- 1 advantage
How to choose
claude-fable-5.1Higher in this week's ranking: #14Longer context: 1M tokensReads images
glyph-clusterFaster: 3.6s on average
claude-fable-5.1
By Anthropic
glyph-cluster
By Stealth
Where they differ
claude-fable-5.1glyph-cluster
On this site
—Availability, last 3 days100%5 calls
10sAverage response this week3.6s
$0.013Price per replyFree
#14Place in this week's ranking#16
$216.67Price per million charactersFree
The model itself
1M tokensContext length256K tokens
128K tokensLongest reply256K tokens
YesReads imagesNo
Jun 2026Knowledge cutoffNot published
1 Sep 2026Released26 Aug 2025
Where they match
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
- Conversations used for trainingUsed to train and improve the provider’s models
- Open weightsNo
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Free models are counted in calls; big models are charged by usage, in US dollars.
Compare next
claude-fable-5.1 against other models
glyph-cluster against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.