claude-fable-5.1 vs glm-5.2
Both can be used on onomeo. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- claude-fable-5.1
- 2 advantages
- glm-5.2
- 3 advantages
How to choose
claude-fable-5.1Steadier this week: 100% of tests passedReads images
glm-5.2Faster: 2.1s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #13Open weights
claude-fable-5.1
By AnthropicNew this week
glm-5.2
By Zhipu AI
Where they differ
claude-fable-5.1glm-5.2
On this site
—Availability, last 3 days96%451 calls
100%3 testsAvailability, this week's tests97%836 tests
3.4sAverage response this week2.1s
$0.018Price per replyFree
#48Place in this week's ranking#13
$216.67Price per million charactersFree
The model itself
YesReads imagesNo
Used to train and improve the provider’s models.Conversations used for trainingThe provider does not say.
Jun 2026Knowledge cutoffNot published
1 Sep 2026Released13 Jun 2026
NoOpen weightsYes
Where they match
- Context length1M tokens
- Longest reply128K tokens
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Free models are counted in calls; big models are charged by usage, in US dollars.
Compare next
claude-fable-5.1 against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.