muse-wonder-1.0 vs glyph-cluster
Both can be used on onomeo. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- muse-wonder-1.0
- 4 advantages
- glyph-cluster
- No edge in the figures
How to choose
muse-wonder-1.0Faster: 1.6s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #12Longer context: 1M tokensReads images
glyph-clusterNo edge in the figures
muse-wonder-1.0
By Meta
glyph-cluster
By Stealth
Where they differ
muse-wonder-1.0glyph-cluster
On this site
—Availability, last 3 days100%5 calls
1.6sAverage response this week3.6s
Charged by usagePrice per replyFree
#12Place in this week's ranking#16
$133.33Price per million charactersFree
The model itself
1M tokensContext length256K tokens
128K tokensLongest reply256K tokens
YesReads imagesNo
12 Oct 2026Released26 Aug 2025
Where they match
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
- Conversations used for trainingUsed to train and improve the provider’s models
- Open weightsNo
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Free models are counted in calls; big models are charged by usage, in US dollars.
Compare next
muse-wonder-1.0 against other models
glyph-cluster against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.