kimi-k3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Both run on onomeo with free credits. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- kimi-k3
- 2 advantages
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 2 advantages
How to choose
kimi-k3Cheaper: about 430 a reply, 99% lessLonger context: 1M tokens
Qwen3.8-Flash-NextFaster: 1.8s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #3
kimi-k3
By Moonshot AINew this week
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
By Qwen
Where they differ
kimi-k3Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
On this site
3.7sAverage response this week1.8s
430Credits per reply41,457
~288Replies a day's check-in buys~4
#44Place in this week's ranking#3
8×Credit multiplier1×
The model itself
1M tokensContext length256K tokens
128K tokensLongest reply64K tokens
Used to train and improve the provider’s models.Conversations used for trainingThe provider does not say.
16 Jul 2026Released27 Aug 2026
Where they match
- Availability, last 3 days100%
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Reads imagesYes
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
- Open weightsYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Replies a day assumes a full daily check-in and the daily call limit.
Compare next
kimi-k3 against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.