grok-4.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Both run on onomeo with free credits. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- grok-4.7
- 1 advantage
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 4 advantages
How to choose
grok-4.7Cheaper: about 145 a reply, 100% less
Qwen3.8-Flash-NextSteadier this week: 100% of tests passedFaster: 1.8s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #3Open weights
grok-4.7
By xAINew this week
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
By Qwen
Where they differ
grok-4.7Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
On this site
85%14 testsAvailability, this week's tests100%27 tests
4.3sAverage response this week1.8s
145Credits per reply41,457
~288Replies a day's check-in buys~4
#40Place in this week's ranking#3
2×Credit multiplier1×
The model itself
500K tokensContext length256K tokens
500K tokensLongest reply64K tokens
Used to train and improve the provider’s models.Conversations used for trainingThe provider does not say.
May 2026Knowledge cutoffNot published
21 Sep 2026Released27 Aug 2026
NoOpen weightsYes
Where they match
- Availability, last 3 days100%
- Reads imagesYes
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Replies a day assumes a full daily check-in and the daily call limit.
Compare next
grok-4.7 against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.