gpt-6.1-sol vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Both can be used on onomeo. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- gpt-6.1-sol
- 2 advantages
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 3 advantages
How to choose
gpt-6.1-solSteadier this week: 100% of tests passedLonger context: 1.1M tokens
Qwen3.8-Flash-NextFaster: 1.8s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #30Open weights
gpt-6.1-sol
By OpenAINew this week
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
By Qwen
Where they differ
gpt-6.1-solQwen3.8-Flash-Next
On this site
—Availability, last 3 days50%22 calls
100%4 testsAvailability, this week's tests68%69 tests
3.1sAverage response this week1.8s
$0.0023Price per replyFree
#45Place in this week's ranking#30
$53.33Price per million charactersFree
The model itself
1.1M tokensContext length256K tokens
Used to train and improve the provider’s models.Conversations used for trainingThe provider does not say.
Apr 2026Knowledge cutoffNot published
29 Sep 2026Released27 Aug 2026
NoOpen weightsYes
Where they match
- Longest reply128K tokens
- Reads imagesYes
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Free models are counted in calls; big models are charged by usage, in US dollars.
Compare next
gpt-6.1-sol against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.