gpt-6-luna vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Both run on onomeo with free credits. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- gpt-6-luna
- 3 advantages
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 2 advantages
How to choose
gpt-6-lunaCheaper: about 2,917 a reply, 93% lessFaster: 1.0s on averageLonger context: 1.1M tokens
Qwen3.8-Flash-NextHigher in this week's ranking: #3Open weights
gpt-6-luna
By OpenAINew this week
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
By Qwen
Where they differ
gpt-6-lunaQwen3.8-Flash-Next
On this site
1.0sAverage response this week1.8s
2,917Credits per reply41,457
~68Replies a day's check-in buys~4
#37Place in this week's ranking#3
The model itself
1.1M tokensContext length256K tokens
128K tokensLongest reply64K tokens
Used to train and improve the provider’s models.Conversations used for trainingThe provider does not say.
May 2026Knowledge cutoffNot published
22 Sep 2026Released27 Aug 2026
NoOpen weightsYes
Where they match
- Availability, last 3 days100%
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Reads imagesYes
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Replies a day assumes a full daily check-in and the daily call limit.
Compare next
gpt-6-luna against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.