gpt-6-astra vs qwen3.8-flash-next
Both can be used on onomeo. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- gpt-6-astra
- 2 advantages
- qwen3.8-flash-next
- 3 advantages
How to choose
gpt-6-astraSteadier this week: 100% of tests passedLonger context: 1.1M tokens
qwen3.8-flash-nextFaster: 1.8s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #18Open weights
gpt-6-astra
By OpenAI
qwen3.8-flash-next
By Qwen
Where they differ
gpt-6-astraqwen3.8-flash-next
On this site
—Availability, last 3 days66%30 calls
100%14 testsAvailability, this week's tests64%62 tests
2.4sAverage response this week1.8s
$0.076Price per replyFree
#26Place in this week's ranking#18
$183.33Price per million charactersFree
The model itself
1.1M tokensContext length256K tokens
Used to train and improve the provider’s models.Conversations used for trainingThe provider does not say.
Apr 2026Knowledge cutoffNot published
4 Sep 2026Released27 Aug 2026
NoOpen weightsYes
Where they match
- Longest reply128K tokens
- Reads imagesYes
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Free models are counted in calls; big models are charged by usage, in US dollars.
Compare next
gpt-6-astra against other models
qwen3.8-flash-next against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.