glm-5.2 vs ling-3.0-flash-sante:free
Both run on onomeo with free credits. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- glm-5.2
- 4 advantages
- ling-3.0-flash-sante:free
- 2 advantages
How to choose
glm-5.2Steadier this week: 100% of tests passedHigher in this week's ranking: #9Longer context: 1M tokensOpen weights
ling-3.0-flash-sante:freeCheaper: about 32 a reply, 99% lessFaster: 0.9s on average
glm-5.2
By Zhipu AI
ling-3.0-flash-sante:free
By Ant Group
Where they differ
glm-5.2ling-3.0-flash-sante:free
On this site
100%89 testsAvailability, this week's tests96%25 tests
2.5sAverage response this week0.9s
2,378Credits per reply32
~84Replies a day's check-in buys~288
#9Place in this week's ranking#14
The model itself
1M tokensContext length256K tokens
128K tokensLongest reply32K tokens
The provider does not say.Conversations used for trainingUsed to train and improve the provider’s models.
13 Jun 2026Released4 Sep 2026
YesOpen weightsNo
Where they match
- Availability, last 3 days100%
- Reads imagesNo
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Replies a day assumes a full daily check-in and the daily call limit.
Compare next
glm-5.2 against other models
ling-3.0-flash-sante:free against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.