glm-5.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
Both run on onomeo with free credits. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- glm-5.2
- 2 advantages
- Qwen3.8-27B
- 3 advantages
How to choose
glm-5.2Cheaper: about 2,378 a reply, 84% lessLonger context: 1M tokens
Qwen3.8-27BFaster: 1.9s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #5Reads images
glm-5.2
By Zhipu AI
Qwen3.8-27B
By QwenNew this week
Where they differ
glm-5.2Qwen3.8-27B
On this site
2.5sAverage response this week1.9s
2,378Credits per reply14,430
~84Replies a day's check-in buys~13
#9Place in this week's ranking#5
The model itself
1M tokensContext length256K tokens
128K tokensLongest reply32K tokens
NoReads imagesYes
13 Jun 2026Released14 Aug 2026
Where they match
- Availability, last 3 days100%
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
- Conversations used for trainingThe provider does not say
- Open weightsYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Replies a day assumes a full daily check-in and the daily call limit.
Compare next
glm-5.2 against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.