free-vision vs muse-wonder-1.0
Both can be used on onomeo. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- free-vision
- 1 advantage
- muse-wonder-1.0
- 1 advantage
How to choose
free-visionNo training on conversations
muse-wonder-1.0Higher in this week's ranking: #14
free-vision
By free-visionNew in the last two weeks
muse-wonder-1.0
By Meta
Where they differ
free-visionmuse-wonder-1.0
On this site
100%15 callsAvailability, last 3 days—
—Average response this week2.7s
FreeReference price per million output tokens$40.00
#19Place in this week's ranking#14
FreeReference price per million input tokens$8.00
The model itself
Not publishedContext length1M tokens
Not publishedLongest reply128K tokens
Not publishedCalls toolsYes
Not used for training.Conversations used for trainingUsed to train and improve the provider’s models.
Not publishedReleased12 Oct 2026
Not publishedOpen weightsNo
FreeReference price per million cache-read tokens$0.40
Where they match
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Reads imagesYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Models marked as free are counted in calls; paid models are charged by usage, in US dollars.
Compare next
free-vision against other models
muse-wonder-1.0 against other models
- vs claude-opus-5.5$40.00Reference price per million output tokens
- vs kimi-k3$30.00Reference price per million output tokens
- vs gemini-4-argon$20.00Reference price per million output tokens
- vs kimi-k3.1-pro$20.00Reference price per million output tokens
- vs claude-sonnet-5.5$20.00Reference price per million output tokens
- vs gpt-6.1-sol$20.00Reference price per million output tokens
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.