gpt-oss-120b vs ling-3.0-flash-sante:free
Both run on onomeo with free credits. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- gpt-oss-120b
- 4 advantages
- ling-3.0-flash-sante:free
- 3 advantages
How to choose
gpt-oss-120bSteadier this week: 100% of tests passedHigher in this week's ranking: #2No training on conversationsOpen weights
ling-3.0-flash-sante:freeCheaper: about 32 a reply, 95% lessFaster: 0.9s on averageLonger context: 256K tokens
gpt-oss-120b
By OpenAI
ling-3.0-flash-sante:free
By Ant Group
Where they differ
gpt-oss-120bling-3.0-flash-sante:free
On this site
100%83 testsAvailability, this week's tests96%25 tests
1.3sAverage response this week0.9s
652Credits per reply32
#2Place in this week's ranking#14
The model itself
128K tokensContext length256K tokens
Not used for training.Conversations used for trainingUsed to train and improve the provider’s models.
Jun 2024Knowledge cutoffNot published
5 Aug 2025Released4 Sep 2026
YesOpen weightsNo
Where they match
- Availability, last 3 days100%
- Replies a day's check-in buys~288
- Longest reply32K tokens
- Reads imagesNo
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Replies a day assumes a full daily check-in and the daily call limit.
Compare next
gpt-oss-120b against other models
ling-3.0-flash-sante:free against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.