gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Both run on onomeo with free credits. Everything below comes from calls made through this site.
- gpt-oss-120b
- 4 advantages
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 2 advantages
How to choose
gpt-oss-120bCheaper: about 652 a reply, 98% lessFaster: 1.3s on averageHigher in this week's ranking: #2No training on conversations
Qwen3.8-Flash-NextLonger context: 256K tokensReads images
gpt-oss-120b
By OpenAI
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
By Qwen
Where they differ
gpt-oss-120bQwen3.8-Flash-Next
On this site
1.3sAverage response this week1.8s
652Credits per reply41,457
~288Replies a day's check-in buys~4
#2Place in this week's ranking#3
The model itself
128K tokensContext length256K tokens
32K tokensLongest reply64K tokens
NoReads imagesYes
Not used for training.Conversations used for trainingThe provider does not say.
Jun 2024Knowledge cutoffNot published
5 Aug 2025Released27 Aug 2026
Where they match
- Availability, last 3 days100%
- Availability, this week's tests100%
- Calls toolsYes
- Thinks before answeringYes
- Open weightsYes
Availability over 3 days counts every call made through the site; this week's availability counts every call over the last 7 days, scheduled tests included, and response time comes from the site's own scheduled tests. Replies a day assumes a full daily check-in and the daily call limit.
Compare next
gpt-oss-120b against other models
Figures come from real calls made through this site. Models are served by third-party providers and may slow down or be withdrawn; this page follows those changes.